{"title":"Law","description":"","products":[{"product_id":"alienated-9780814776742","title":"Alienated","description":"\u003cp\u003eThroughout American history, the government has used U.S. citizenship and immigration law to protect privileged groups from less privileged ones, using citizenship as a “legitimate” proxy for otherwise invidious, and often unconstitutional, discrimination on the basis of race. While racial discrimination is rarely legally acceptable today, profiling on the basis of citizenship is still largely unchecked, and has in fact arguably increased in the wake of the September 11 terror attacks on the United States. In this thoughtful examination of the intersection between American immigration and constitutional law, Victor C. Romero draws our attention to a “constitutional immigration law paradox” that reserves certain rights for U.S. citizens only, while simultaneously purporting to treat all people fairly under constitutional law regardless of citizenship.\u003cbr\u003eAs a naturalized Filipino American, Romero brings an outsider's perspective to Alienated, forcing us to look at constitutional immigration law from the vantage point of people whose citizenship status is murky (either legally or from the viewpoint of other citizens and lawmakers), including foreign-born adoptees, undocumented immigrants, tourists, foreign students, and same-gender bi-national partners. Romero endorses an equality-based reading of the Constitution and advocates a new theoretical and practical approach that protects the individual rights of non-citizens without sacrificing their personhood.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Victor C. Romero","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088730599675,"sku":"9780814776742","price":50.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_c8494c5e-f3a4-482a-95bf-e37e0a84fdb6.jpg?v=1784890770"},{"product_id":"what-is-parenthood-9780814789421","title":"What Is Parenthood?","description":"\u003cp\u003eExtraordinary changes in patterns of family life—and family  law—have dramatically altered the boundaries of parenthood and opened up  numerous questions and debates. What is parenthood and why does it  matter? How should society define, regulate, and support it? Is  parenthood separable from marriage—or couplehood—when society seeks to  foster children’s well-being? What is the better model of parenthood  from the perspective of child outcomes? \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIntense disagreements over the definition and future of marriage often rest upon conflicting convictions about parenthood. What Is Parenthood?  asks bold and direct questions about parenthood in contemporary  society, and it brings together a stellar interdisciplinary group of  scholars with widely varying perspectives to investigate them. Editors  Linda C. McClain and Daniel Cere facilitate a dynamic conversation  between scholars from several disciplines about competing models of  parenthood and a sweeping array of topics, including single parenthood,  adoption, donor-created families, gay and lesbian parents, transnational  parenthood, parent-child attachment, and gender difference and  parenthood.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Linda C. McClain","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088734236923,"sku":"9780814789421","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_a75f1859-4e34-43b8-84b7-d96cb25b7f3c.jpg?v=1785138071"},{"product_id":"bodies-in-evidence-9781479809653","title":"Bodies in Evidence","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eWinner, 2021-2022 AES Senior Book Prize, awarded by the American Ethnological Society\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eHonorable Mention, Senior Book Prize of the Association for Feminist Anthropology\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eUncovers how the process of sexual assault adjudication reinforces inequality and becomes a public spectacle of violence\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor victims in sexual assault cases, trials rarely result in justice. Instead, the courts drag defendants, victims, and their friends and family through a confusing and protracted public spectacle. Along the way, forensic scientists, sexual assault nurse examiners, and police officers provide their insight and expertise, shaping the story that emerges for the judge and jury. These expert narratives intersect with the stories of victims, witnesses, and their communities to reproduce our cultural understandings of sexual violence, but too often this process results in reinscribing racial, gendered, and class inequalities. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003eBodies in Evidence\u003c\/i\u003e draws on observations of over 680 court appearances in Milwaukee County’s felony sexual assault courts, as well as interviews with judges, attorneys, forensic scientists, jurors, sexual assault nurse examiners, and victim advocates. It shows how forensic science helps to propagate public misunderstandings of sexual violence by bestowing an aura of authority to race and gender stereotypes and inequalities. Expert testimony reinforces the idea that sexual assault is physically and emotionally recognizable and always leaves material evidence. The court’s reliance on the  presence of forensic evidence infuses these very familiar stereotypes and myths about sexual assault with new scientific authority.  \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePowerful, unflinching, and at times heartbreaking, \u003ci\u003eBodies in Evidence\u003c\/i\u003e reveals the human cost of sexual assault adjudication, and the social cost we all bear when investing in forms of justice that reproduce inequality and racial injustice.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Heather R. Hlavka","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088734367995,"sku":"9781479809653","price":24.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_937c66a4-87d9-40b6-b535-eeb586cb63a0.jpg?v=1789532324"},{"product_id":"unfit-for-democracy-9780814733011","title":"Unfit for Democracy","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAsked if the country was governed by a republic or a monarchy, Benjamin Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSince its founding, Americans have worked hard to nurture and protect their hard-won democracy. And yet few consider the role of constitutional law in America’s survival. In Unfit for Democracy, Stephen Gottlieb argues that constitutional law without a focus on the future of democratic government is incoherent—illogical and contradictory. Approaching the decisions of the Roberts Court from political science, historical, comparative, and legal perspectives, Gottlieb highlights the dangers the court presents by neglecting to interpret the law with an eye towards preserving democracy.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA senior scholar of constitutional law, Gottlieb brings a pioneering will to his theoretical and comparative criticism of the Roberts Court. The Roberts Court decisions are not examined in a vacuum but instead viewed in light of constitutional politics in India, South Africa, emerging Eastern European nations, and others. While constitutional decisions abroad have contributed to both the breakdown and strengthening of democratic politics, decisions in the Roberts Court have aggravated the potential destabilizing factors in democratic governments. Ultimately, Unfit for Democracy calls for an interpretation of the Constitution that takes the future of democracy seriously. Gottlieb warns that the Roberts Court’s decisions have hurt ordinary Americans economically, politically, and in the criminal process. They have damaged the historic American melting pot, increased the risk of anti-democratic paramilitaries, and clouded the democratic future.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Stephen E. Gottlieb","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088741609723,"sku":"9780814733011","price":24.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_d30ad8a2-724d-4654-b7cf-eead3c27630d.jpg?v=1785137624"},{"product_id":"democratic-failure-9781479804795","title":"Democratic Failure","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eExplores the challenges facing democracies in the twenty-first century\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eDemocratic Failure\u003c\/i\u003e, Melissa Schwartzberg and Daniel Viehoff bring together a distinguished group of interdisciplinary scholars in political science, law, and philosophy to explore the key questions and challenges facing democracies, both in the past and present, around the world.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn ten timely essays, contributors examine the fascinating, centuries-old question of whether or not democracy can ever fulfill the promise of its ideals. Together, they explore lessons from the history of democracy, various failures of democratic representation, and more.  \u003cbr\u003eUltimately, this latest installment of the NOMOS series provides thought-provoking insights into how we conceptualize, measure, and address democratic erosion in our present-day world.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Melissa Schwartzberg","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088846303483,"sku":"9781479804795","price":49.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_50e4db5e-c642-4a84-b24f-5288e961bb45.jpg?v=1770442695"},{"product_id":"contemporary-latinao-media-9781479893881","title":"Contemporary Latina\/o Media","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe cultural politics creating and consuming Latina\/o mass media.\u003c\/b\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eJust ten years ago, discussions of\u003cbr\u003eLatina\/o media could be safely reduced to a handful of TV channels, dominated\u003cbr\u003eby Univision and Telemundo. Today, dramatic changes in the global political\u003cbr\u003eeconomy have resulted in an unprecedented rise in major new media ventures for\u003cbr\u003eLatinos as everyone seems to want a piece of the Latina\/o media market. While\u003cbr\u003ecurrent scholarship on Latina\/o media have mostly revolved around important\u003cbr\u003eissues of representation and stereotypes, this approach does not provide the\u003cbr\u003eentire story.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn Contemporary Latina\/o Media,\u003cbr\u003eArlene Dávila and Yeidy M. Rivero bring together an impressive range of leading\u003cbr\u003escholars to move beyond analyses of media representations, going behind the\u003cbr\u003escenes to explore issues of production, circulation, consumption, and political\u003cbr\u003eeconomy that affect Latina\/o mass media. Working across the disciplines of\u003cbr\u003eLatina\/o media, cultural studies, and communication, the contributors examine\u003cbr\u003ehow Latinos are being affected both by the continued Latin Americanization of\u003cbr\u003egenres, products, and audiences, as well as by the whitewashing of “mainstream”\u003cbr\u003eHollywood media where Latinos have been consistently bypassed.  While focusing\u003cbr\u003eon Spanish-language television and radio, the essays also touch on the state of\u003cbr\u003eLatinos in prime-time television and in digital and alternative media. Using a\u003cbr\u003etransnational approach, the volume as a whole explores the ownership,\u003cbr\u003eimportation, and circulation of talent and content from Latin America, placing\u003cbr\u003ethe dynamics of the global political economy and cultural politics in the\u003cbr\u003eforeground of contemporary analysis of Latina\/o media.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Arlene Dávila","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088846532859,"sku":"9781479893881","price":26.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_16b48636-ebf9-4f4a-ad0c-602ef4321684.jpg?v=1784890857"},{"product_id":"strange-neighbors-9780814760628","title":"Strange Neighbors","description":"\u003cp\u003eSince its founding, the U.S. has struggled with\u003cbr\u003eissues of federalism and states’ rights. In almost every area of law, from\u003cbr\u003eabortion to zoning, conflicts arise between the states and the federal\u003cbr\u003egovernment over which entity is best suited to create and enforce laws. In the\u003cbr\u003elast decade, immigration has been on the front lines of this debate, with\u003cbr\u003estates such as Arizona taking an extremely assertive role in policing\u003cbr\u003eimmigrants within their borders. While Arizona and its notorious SB 1070 is the\u003cbr\u003emost visible example of states claiming expanded responsibility to make and\u003cbr\u003eenforce immigration law, it is far from alone. An ordinance in\u003cbr\u003eHazelton, Pennsylvania prohibited landlords from renting to the undocumented. Several\u003cbr\u003estates have introduced legislation to deny citizenship to babies who are born\u003cbr\u003eto parents who are in the United States without authorization. Other states\u003cbr\u003ehave also enacted legislation aimed at driving out unauthorized migrants.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eStrange Neighbors explores the complicated and complicating role\u003cbr\u003eof the states in immigration policy and enforcement, including voices from both\u003cbr\u003esides of the debate. While many contributors point to the dangers inherent in\u003cbr\u003estate regulation of immigration policy, at least two support it, while others\u003cbr\u003eoffer empirically-based examinations of state efforts to regulate immigration\u003cbr\u003ewithin their borders, pointing to wide, state-by-state disparities in\u003cbr\u003elocally-administered immigration policies and laws. Ultimately, the book offers\u003cbr\u003ean extremely timely, thorough, and spirited discussion on an issue that will\u003cbr\u003econtinue to dominate state and federal legislatures for years to come.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Carissa Byrne Hessick","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088846663931,"sku":"9780814760628","price":45.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_ef6d7026-3574-4e4b-974a-690494952d90.jpg?v=1785136578"},{"product_id":"masculinities-and-the-law-9780814723500","title":"Masculinities and the Law","description":"\u003cp\u003eAccording to masculinities theory, masculinity is not a biological imperative but a social construction. Men engage in a constant struggle with other men to prove their masculinity. Masculinities and the Law develops a multidimensional approach. It sees categories of identity—including various forms of raced, classed, and sex-oriented masculinities—as operating simultaneously and creating different effects in different contexts.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBy applying multidimensional masculinities theory to law, this cutting-edge collection both expands the field of masculinities and develops new thinking about important issues in feminist and critical race theories. The topics covered include how norms of masculinity influence the behavior of policemen, firefighters, and international soldiers on television and in the real world; employment discrimination against masculine cocktail waitresses and all transgendered employees; the legal treatment of fathers in the U.S. and the ways unauthorized migrant fathers use the dangers of border crossing to boost their masculine esteem; how Title IX fails to curtail the masculinity of sport; the racist assumptions behind the prison rape debate; the surprising roots of homophobia in Jamaican dancehall music; and the contradictions of the legal debate over women veiling in Turkey. Ultimately, the book argues that multidimensional masculinities theory can change how law is interpreted and applied.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Frank Rudy Cooper","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088847778043,"sku":"9780814723500","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_84ae1208-2c3d-471a-befc-37fbba757683.jpg?v=1785135369"},{"product_id":"defining-the-family-9780814721070","title":"Defining the Family","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eDefining the Family: Law, Technology, and Reproduction in an Uneasy Age\u003c\/i\u003e provides a sweeping portrait of the family in American law from the nineteenth century to the present. The family today has come to be defined by individuality and choice. Pre-nuptial agreements, non-marital cohabitation, gay and lesbian marriages have all profoundly altered our ideas about marriage and family. In the last few years, reproductive technology and surrogacy have accelerated this process of change at a breathtaking rate. Once simple questions have taken on a dizzying complexity: Who are the real parents of a child? What are the relationships and responsibilities between a child, the woman who carried it to term, and the egg donor? Between viable sperm and the wife of a dead donor?\u003cbr\u003e The courts and the law have been wildly inconsistent and indecisive when grappling with these questions. Should these cases be decided in light of laws governing contracts and property? Or it is more appropriate to act in the best interests of the child, even if that child is unborn, or even unconceived? No longer merely settling disputes among family members, the law is now seeing its own role expand, to the point where it is asked to regulate situations unprecedented in human history. Janet L. Dolgin charts the response of the law to modern reproductive technology both as it transforms our image of the family and is itself transformed by the tide of social forces.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Janet L. Dolgin","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088848367867,"sku":"9780814721070","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_dea798f2-85c1-43ed-9b50-095eed1350a5.jpg?v=1784891708"},{"product_id":"we-dissent-9780814707371","title":"We Dissent","description":"\u003cp\u003eThe lawyers and legal commentators who contribute to \u003cb\u003eWe Dissent\u003c\/b\u003e unanimously agree that during Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s nineteen-year tenure, the Supreme Court failed to adequately protect civil liberties and civil rights. This is evident in majority opinions written for numerous cases heard by the Rehnquist Court, and eight of those cases are re-examined here, with contributors offering dissents to the Court’s decisions. The Supreme Court opinions criticized in \u003cb\u003eWe Dissent\u003c\/b\u003e suggest that the Rehnquist Court placed the interests of government above the people, and as the dissents in this book demonstrate, the Court strayed far from our constitutional ideals when it abandoned its commitment to the protection of the individual rights of Americans.\u003cbr\u003eEach chapter focuses on a different case—ranging from torture to search and seizure, and from racial profiling to the freedom of political expression—with contributors summarizing the case and the decision, and then offering their own dissent to the majority opinion. For some cases featured in the book, the Court’s majority decisions were unanimous, so readers can see here for the first time what a dissent might have looked like. In other cases, contributors offer alternative dissents to the minority opinion, thereby widening the scope of opposition to key civil liberties decision made by the Rehnquist Court.\u003cbr\u003eTaken together, the dissents in this unique book address the pressing issue of Constitutional protection of individual freedom, and present a vision of constitutional law in the United States that differs considerably from the recent jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eContributors:\u003c\/b\u003e Michael Avery, Erwin Chemerinsky,Marjorie Cohn, Tracey Maclin, Eva Paterson, Jamin Raskin, David Rudovsky, Susan Kiyomi Serrano, and Abbe Smith.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Michael Avery","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088848466171,"sku":"9780814707371","price":37.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_ecc00724-d1cc-4b0b-8018-2ff83901f370.jpg?v=1785137092"},{"product_id":"inner-lives-9780814743850","title":"Inner Lives","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAn intimate collection of African American women's voices on their lives in prison\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe rate of women entering prison has increased nearly 400 percent since 1980, with African American women constituting the largest percentage of this population. However, despite their extremely disproportional representation in correctional institutions, little attention has been paid to their experiences within the criminal justice system.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eInner Lives\u003c\/b\u003e provides readers the rare opportunity to intimately connect with African American women prisoners. By presenting the women's stories in their own voices, Paula C. Johnson captures the reality of those who are in the system, and those who are working to help them. Johnson offers a nuanced and compelling portrait of this fastest-growing prison population by blending legal history, ethnography, sociology, and criminology. These striking and vivid narratives are accompanied by equally compelling arguments by Johnson on how to reform our nation's laws and social policies, in order to eradicate existing inequalities. Her thorough and insightful analysis of the historical and legal background of contemporary criminal law doctrine, sentencing theories, and correctional policies sets the stage for understanding the current system.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Paula Johnson","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088848662779,"sku":"9780814743850","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_f0d3a489-a307-491f-8f22-9d46a2c17357.jpg?v=1784891114"},{"product_id":"jekyll-on-trial-9780814788639","title":"Jekyll on Trial","description":"\u003cp\u003eThe idea that multiple personalities can exist within the same body has long captured the Western imagination. From Three Faces of Eve to Sybil, from Pyscho to Raising Caine, from 60 Minutes to Oprah to One Life to Live, we are captivated by the fate of multiples who, divided against themselves, wreak havoc in the lives of others.\u003cbr\u003e Why do we find multiple personality disorder (MPD) so fascinating? Perhaps because each of us is aware of a dividedness within ourselves: we often feel as if we are one person on the job, another with our families, another with our friends and lovers. We may fantasize that these inner discrepancies will someday break free, that within us lie other personalities--genius, lover, criminal--that will take us over and render us strangers to our very selves.\u003cbr\u003e What happens when such a transformation literally occurs, when an alter personality surfaces and commits some heinous deed? What do we do when a Billy Milligan is arrested for a series of rapes and robberies, of which the original personality, Billy, is utterly oblivious? What happens when a Juanita Maxwell, taken over by her alter personality, Wanda, becomes enraged and commits a murder which would horrify Juanita? Who really committed these deeds? Are alter personalities people? Are they centers of consciousness which are akin to people? Mere parts of a deeply divided person? Who should held accountable for the crimes? Which is more appropriate--punishment or treatment? In Jekyll on Trial, Elyn R. Saks carefully delineates how MPD forces us to re-examine our central concepts of personhood, responsibility, and punishment. Drawing on law, psychiatry, and philosophy, Saks explores the nature of alter personalities, and shows how different conceptualizations bear on criminal responsibility. A wide-ranging and deeply informed book, Jekyll on Trial is must reading for anyone interested in law, criminal justice, psychiatry, or human behavior.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Elyn R. Saks","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088848793851,"sku":"9780814788639","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_4aedbafe-4a8c-4584-8e98-d3074e4faa98.jpg?v=1784891604"},{"product_id":"the-coming-race-war-9780814721032","title":"The Coming Race War","description":"\u003cp\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eThe Washington Post\u003c\/i\u003e, Julius Lester praised Richard Delgado's \u003cb\u003eThe Rodrigo Chronicles: Conversations about America and Race\u003c\/b\u003e as free of cant and ideology. . . . an excellent starting place for the national discussion about race we so desperately need. \u003ci\u003eThe New York Times\u003c\/i\u003e has hailed Delgado as a pioneer in the study of race and law, and the \u003ci\u003eLos Angeles Times\u003c\/i\u003e has compared his storytelling style to Plato's Dialogues.\u003cbr\u003e In \u003cb\u003eThe Coming Race War?\u003c\/b\u003e, Delgado turns his attention to the American racial landscape in the wake of the mid-term elections in 1994. Our political and racial topography has been radically altered. Affirmative action is being rolled back, immigrants continue to be targeted as the source of economic woes, and race is increasingly downplayed as a source of the nation's problems. Legal obstacles to racial equality have long been removed, we are told, so what's the problem?\u003cbr\u003e And yet, the plight of the urban poor grows worse. The number of young black men in prison continues to exceed those in college. Informal racial privilege remains entrenched and systemic. Where, asks Delgado in this new volume, will this lead? Enlisting his fictional counterpart, Rodrigo Crenshaw, to untangle the complexities of America's racial future, Delgado explores merit and affirmative action; the nature of empathy and, more commonly, false empathy; and the limitations of legal change. Warning of the dangers of depriving the underprivileged of all hope and opportunity, Delgado gives us a dark future in which an indignant white America casts aside, once and for all, the spirit of the civil rights movement, with disastrous results.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Richard Delgado","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088852463867,"sku":"9780814721032","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_b98f7d26-9d36-4268-9dbf-571c8e6d85ce.jpg?v=1785136363"},{"product_id":"the-guantanamo-lawyers-9780814720813","title":"The Guantánamo Lawyers","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe stories of Guantánamo detainees, silenced and imprisoned without trial, as told by their lawyers\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFollowing the terrorist attacks of 9\/11, the United States imprisoned more than seven hundred and fifty men at its naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. These men, ranging from teenage boys to men in their eighties from over forty different countries, were detained for years without charges, trial, and a fair hearing. Without any legal status or protection, they were truly outside the law: imprisoned in secret, denied communication with their families, and subjected to extreme isolation, physical and mental abuse, and, in some instances, torture.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThese are the detainees’ stories, told by their lawyers because the prisoners themselves were silenced. It took habeas counsel more than two years—and a ruling from the United States Supreme Court—to finally gain the right to visit and talk to their clients at Guantánamo. Even then, lawyers were forced to operate under severe restrictions designed to inhibit communication and envelop the prison in secrecy. In time, however, lawyers were able to meet with their clients and bring the truth about Guantánamo to the world.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe Guantánamo Lawyers contains over one hundred personal narratives from attorneys who have represented detainees held at “GTMO” as well as at other overseas prisons, from Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan to secret CIA jails or “black sites.” Mark Denbeaux and Jonathan Hafetz—themselves lawyers for detainees—collected stories that cover virtually every facet of Guantánamo, and the litigation it sparked. Together, these moving, powerful voices create a historical record of Guantánamo’s legal, human, and moral failings, and provide a window into America’s catastrophic effort to create a prison beyond the law.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn online archive, hosted by New York University Libraries, will be available at the time of publication and will contain the complete texts as well as other accounts contributed by Guantánamo lawyers. The documents will be freely available on the Internet for research, teaching, and non-commercial uses, and will be preserved indefinitely as a historical collection.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Jonathan Hafetz","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088856363259,"sku":"9780814720813","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_64619d35-b95e-40f4-b516-70157bb756e4.jpg?v=1785136812"},{"product_id":"at-liberty-to-die-9780814745274","title":"At Liberty to Die","description":"\u003cp\u003e\"Ball's arguments are concise, compelling, and backed with considerable case law. This volume is highly recommended for upper-level undergraduates and above in law, philosophy, and the medical humanities interested in the 'right to die' debates. Summing up: Highly recommended.\" —Choice\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOver the\u003cbr\u003epast hundred years, average life expectancy in America has nearly doubled, due\u003cbr\u003elargely to scientific and medical advances, but also as a consequence of safer\u003cbr\u003eworking conditions, a heightened awareness of the importance of diet and\u003cbr\u003ehealth, and other factors. Yet while longevity is celebrated as an achievement\u003cbr\u003ein modern civilization, the longer people live, the more likely they are to\u003cbr\u003esuccumb to chronic, terminal illnesses. In 1900, the average life expectancy\u003cbr\u003ewas 47 years, with a majority of American deaths attributed to influenza, tuberculosis,\u003cbr\u003epneumonia, or other diseases. In 2000, the average life expectancy was nearly\u003cbr\u003e80 years, and for too many people, these long lifespans included cancer, heart\u003cbr\u003efailure, Lou Gehrig’s disease, AIDS, or other fatal illnesses, and with them,\u003cbr\u003ecame debilitating pain and the loss of a once-full and often independent\u003cbr\u003elifestyle. In this compelling and provocative book, noted legal scholar Howard\u003cbr\u003eBall poses the pressing question: is it appropriate, legally and ethically, for\u003cbr\u003ea competent individual to have the liberty to decide how and when to die when\u003cbr\u003efaced with a terminal illness?\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAt Liberty to Die charts how, the right\u003cbr\u003eof a competent, terminally ill person to die on his or her own terms with the\u003cbr\u003ehelp of a doctor has come deeply embroiled in debates about the relationship\u003cbr\u003ebetween religion, civil liberties, politics, and law in American life.\u003cbr\u003eExploring both the legal rulings and the media frenzies that accompanied the\u003cbr\u003eTerry Schiavo case and others like it, Howard Ball contends that despite raging\u003cbr\u003ebattles in all the states where right to die legislation has been proposed, the\u003cbr\u003eopposition to the right to die is intractable in its stance. Combining\u003cbr\u003econstitutional analysis, legal history, and current events, Ball surveys the\u003cbr\u003econstitutional arguments that have driven the right to die debate.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Howard Ball","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088856428795,"sku":"9780814745274","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_bda9b12a-a299-4160-a089-f910ac5de852.jpg?v=1784890684"},{"product_id":"presidential-powers-9780814749333","title":"Presidential Powers","description":"\u003cp\u003eFramed in Article II of the Constitution, presidential powers are dictated today by judicial as well as historical precedent. To understand the ways the president wields power as well as how this power is kept in check by other branches of government, Harold J. Krent presents three overlapping determinants of the president's role under the Constitution-the need for presidential initiative in administering the law and providing foreign policy leadership, the importance of maintaining congressional control over policymaking, and the imperative to ensure that the president be accountable to the public.\u003cbr\u003eKrent’s examination is sweeping, ranging from the president's ability to appoint and remove executive branch officials, to the president's role in proposing and implementing treaties and the power to conduct war, to the extent the president can refuse to turn over information in response to congressional and judicial requests. Finally, Krent addresses the history and purposes of presidential pardons.\u003cbr\u003eBy drawing on historic and contemporary presidential actions to illustrate his points, Krent reminds us that the president is both an exalted leader with the regalia of power and an American who is and should be accountable to fellow citizens-important considerations as we elect and assess our presidents.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Harold J Krent","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088856592635,"sku":"9780814749333","price":40.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_6a6136f2-73f2-4a79-93da-ca2548a24063.jpg?v=1785135494"},{"product_id":"the-immigration-law-death-penalty-9781479816309","title":"The Immigration Law Death Penalty","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTraces the role of the aggravated felony in today’s deportation regime\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn immigration courts across America, a non-citizen convicted of an “aggravated felony” will almost certainly face deportation with no access to asylum. However, despite the ominous-sounding name, aggravated felonies need not be either “aggravated” or “felonies.” The term encompasses more than thirty offenses, ranging from check fraud and shoplifting to filing a false tax return. The recent expansion in the list of such offenses has resulted in astronomical rates of deportation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis book chronicles the rise of the use of the aggravated felony, known by lawyers as the “immigration law death penalty,” to criminalize and then deport immigrants. Immigrants convicted of aggravated felonies are subject to mandatory detention and almost certain deportation—and are ineligible for almost all forms of legal relief from removal. Furthermore, immigrants convicted of aggravated felonies can be detained for months or even years without bond, are not guaranteed lawyers, and can even be deported without an opportunity to plead their case in court. Sarah Tosh provides the first in-depth understanding of how aggravated felonies have been used to deport thousands of documented and undocumented immigrants and how the severe, expansive, and racially disparate outcomes have been met with innovative legal responses, bolstered by networks of community-based resistance. \u003ci\u003eThe Immigration Law Death Penalty\u003c\/i\u003e is an urgent read for anyone committed to protecting the rights of immigrants nationwide.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Sarah Tosh","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088860066043,"sku":"9781479816309","price":23.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_c2ed1e3f-ec98-475b-9ac0-2764dd21d40c.jpg?v=1785373987"},{"product_id":"reimagining-equality-9781479893522","title":"Reimagining Equality","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003e2018 Outstanding Academic Title, given by Choice Magazine\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA comprehensive examination of developmental inequality among children \u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDevelopmental equality–whether every child has an equal opportunity to reach their fullest potential–is essential for children’s future growth and access to opportunity. In the United States, however, children of color are disproportionately affected by poverty, poor educational outcomes, and structural discrimination, limiting their potential.  In \u003ci\u003eReimagining Equality\u003c\/i\u003e, Nancy E. Dowd sets out to examine the roots of these inequalities by tracing the life course of black boys from birth to age 18 in an effort to create an affirmative system of rights and support for all children. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDrawing on interdisciplinary research, the book demonstrates that black boys encounter challenges and barriers that funnel them toward failure rather than developmental success.  Their example exposes a broader reality of hierarchies among children, linked to government policies, practices, structures, and institutions.  Dowd argues for a new legal model of developmental equality, grounded in the real challenges that children face on the basis of race, gender, and class.  \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eConcluding with a “New Deal” for all children, Reimagining Equality provides a comprehensive set of policies that enables our political and legal systems to dismantle what harms and discriminates children, and maximize their development.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Nancy E. Dowd","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088860262651,"sku":"9781479893522","price":31.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_fb815fa7-6956-498d-94d3-b21253a6226b.jpg?v=1785137677"},{"product_id":"policing-hatred-9781479828364","title":"Policing Hatred","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eExplores the intersection of race and law enforcement in the controversial area of hate crime\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHigh-profile hate crimes like the torture-murder of Matthew Shepard and the dragging death of James Byrd have drawn the nation’s attention, but there are thousands of other individuals who are attacked because of their race, religion, or sexual orientation each year. This study of hate crimes challenges common assumptions regarding perpetrators and victims: most of the accused tend to be white, while most of their victims are not.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003ePolicing Hatred\u003c\/i\u003e is an in-depth ethnographic study of how hate crime law works in practice, from the perspective of those enforcing it. It examines the ways in which the police handle bias crimes, and the social impact of those efforts. Bell exposes the power that law enforcement personnel have to influence the social environment by showing how they determine whether an incident will be charged as a bias crime.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDrawing on her unprecedented access to a police hate crime unit, Bell’s work brings to life the stories of female, Black, Latino, and Asian American detectives, in addition to those of their white male counterparts. \u003ci\u003ePolicing Hatred\u003c\/i\u003e also explores the impact of victim’s identity on each officers handling of bias crimes and addresses how the police treat defendants’ First Amendment rights. Bell’s vivid evidence from the field argues persuasively for the need to have the police diligently address even low-level offenses, such as vandalism, given their devastating cumulative effects on society.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Jeannine Bell","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088863736059,"sku":"9781479828364","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_e655cbb7-a0af-4f73-9e58-ed2ad7a6d064.jpg?v=1791432753"},{"product_id":"why-lawsuits-are-good-for-america-9780814737941","title":"Why Lawsuits are Good for America","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eArgues that lawsuits work far better than commonly understood\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eJudging by the frequency with which it makes an appearance in television news shows and late night stand up routines, the frivolous lawsuit has become part and parcel of our national culture. A woman sues McDonald’s because she was scalded when she spilled her coffee. Thousands file lawsuits claiming they were injured by Agent Orange, silicone breast implants, or Bendectin although scientists report these substances do not cause the diseases in question. The United States, conventional wisdom has it, is a hyperlitigious society, propelled by avaricious lawyers, harebrained judges, and runaway juries. Lawsuits waste money and time and, moreover, many are simply groundless.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCarl T. Bogus is not so sure. In \u003cb\u003eWhy Lawsuits Are Good for America\u003c\/b\u003e, Bogus argues that common law works far better than commonly understood. Indeed, Bogus contends that while the system can and occasionally does produce “wrong” results, it is very difficult for it to make flatly irrational decisions. Blending history, theory, empirical data, and colorful case studies, Bogus explains why the common law, rather than being outdated, may be more necessary than ever.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e As Bogus sees it, the common law is an essential adjunct to governmental regulation—essential, in part, because it is not as easily manipulated by big business. Meanwhile, big business has launched an all out war on the common law. “Tort reform”—measures designed to make more difficult for individuals to sue corporations—one of the ten proposals in the Republican Contract With America, and George W. Bush’s first major initiative as Governor of Texas. And much of what we have come to believe about the system comes from a coordinated propaganda effort by big business and its allies.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Bogus makes a compelling case for the necessity of safeguarding the system from current assaults. \u003cb\u003eWhy Lawsuits Are Good for America\u003c\/b\u003e provides broad historical overviews of the development of American common law, torts, products liability, as well as fresh and provocative arguments about the role of the system of “disciplined democracy” in the twenty-first century.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Carl T. Bogus","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088867930363,"sku":"9780814737941","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_fdd94ca9-8393-4876-bce5-fc1bb419065c.jpg?v=1785137480"},{"product_id":"the-vigilant-citizen-9781479816552","title":"The Vigilant Citizen","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHow the problematic behavior of private citizens—and not just the police force itself—contributes to the perpetuation of police brutality and institutional racism\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“Warning: Neighborhood Watch Program in Force. If I don’t call the police, my neighbor will!”\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSigns like this can be found affixed to telephone poles on streets throughout the US, warning trespassers that the community is an active participant in its own policing efforts. Thijs Jeursen calls this phenomenon, in which individuals take on the responsibility of defending themselves and share with the police the duty to mitigate everyday insecurity, “vigilant citizenship.”\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDrawing on eleven months of fieldwork in Miami and sharing the stories and experiences of police officers, private security guards, neighborhood watch groups, civil society organizations, and a broad range of residents and activists, Jeursen uses the lens of vigilant citizenship to extend the analysis of police brutality beyond police encounters, focusing on the often blurred boundaries between policing actors and policed citizens and highlighting the many ways in which policing produces and perpetuates inequality and injustice. As a central premise in everyday policing, vigilant citizenship frames racist and violent policing as matters of personal blame and individual guilt, ultimately downplaying the realities of how systemically race operates in policing and US society more broadly. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003eThe Vigilant Citizen\u003c\/i\u003e illustrates how a focus on individualized responsibility for security exacerbates and legitimizes existing inequalities, a situation that must be addressed to end institutionalized racism in politics and the justice system.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Thijs Jeursen","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088872255739,"sku":"9781479816552","price":21.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_c78dccba-7367-4d0f-bd86-5f36f004aafd.jpg?v=1789532310"},{"product_id":"prosecution-complex-9780814796252","title":"Prosecution Complex","description":"\u003cp\u003eAmerican prosecutors are asked to play two roles within the criminal justice system: they are supposed to be ministers of justice whose only goals are to ensure fair trials—and they are also advocates of the government whose success rates are measured by how many convictions they get. Because of this second role, sometimes prosecutors suppress evidence in order to establish a defendant’s guilt and safeguard that conviction over time. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn Prosecution Complex, Daniel S. Medwed shows how prosecutors are told to lock up criminals and protect the rights of defendants. This double role creates an institutional “prosecution complex” that animates how district attorneys’ offices treat potentially innocent defendants at all stages of the process—and that can cause prosecutors to aid in the conviction of the innocent. Ultimately, Prosecution Complex shows how, while most prosecutors aim to do justice, only some hit that target consistently.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Daniel S. Medwed","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088872485115,"sku":"9780814796252","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_79ac1a0e-70ef-47a9-81be-b30996c435f2.jpg?v=1785135553"},{"product_id":"free-speech-beyond-words-9781479873746","title":"Free Speech Beyond Words","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eA look at First Amendment coverage of music, non-representational art, and nonsense\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe Supreme Court has unanimously held that Jackson Pollock’s paintings, Arnold Schöenberg’s music, and Lewis Carroll’s poem “Jabberwocky” are “unquestionably shielded” by the First Amendment. Nonrepresentational art, instrumental music, and nonsense: all receive constitutional coverage under an amendment protecting “the freedom of speech,” even though none involves what we typically think of as speech—the use of words to convey meaning.   \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAs a legal matter, the Court’s conclusion is clearly correct, but its premises are murky, and they raise difficult questions about the possibilities and limitations of law and expression. Nonrepresentational art, instrumental music, and nonsense do not employ language in any traditional sense, and sometimes do not even involve the transmission of articulable ideas. How, then, can they be treated as “speech” for constitutional purposes? What does the difficulty of that question suggest for First Amendment law and theory? And can law resolve such inquiries without relying on aesthetics, ethics, and philosophy?  \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eComprehensive and compelling, this book represents a sustained effort to account, constitutionally, for these modes of “speech.” While it is firmly centered in debates about First Amendment issues, it addresses them in a novel way, using subject matter that is uniquely well suited to the task, and whose constitutional salience has been under-explored. Drawing on existing legal doctrine, aesthetics, and analytical philosophy, three celebrated law scholars show us how and why speech beyond words should be fundamental to our understanding of the First Amendment.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Mark V. Tushnet","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088875696379,"sku":"9781479873746","price":18.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_99058a0f-2aec-40b1-bad4-ec08c09f2e2f.jpg?v=1785137891"},{"product_id":"the-embattled-constitution-9780814785836","title":"The Embattled Constitution","description":"\u003cp\u003e\"An indispensable and provocative guide through the thicket of today's most challenging constitutional controversies by some of the most eminent judges of their time. It offers an invaluable peek behind the curtain of judicial decision making.\"\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e—David Cole, Professor of Law, Georgetown University  \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe Embattled\u003cbr\u003eConstitution presents the\u003cbr\u003efourth collection of the James Madison lectures delivered at the NYU School of\u003cbr\u003eLaw, offering thoughtful examinations of an array of topics on civil liberties\u003cbr\u003eby a distinguished group of federal judges, including Justice Stephen Breyer of\u003cbr\u003ethe U.S. Supreme Court. The result is a fascinating look into the minds of the\u003cbr\u003ejudges who interpret, apply, and give meaning to our “embattled Constitution.”\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn these insightful\u003cbr\u003eand incisive essays, the authors bring to bear decades of experience to explore\u003cbr\u003ewide-ranging issues. Are today’s public schools racially segregated? To what\u003cbr\u003eextent can the federal courts apply the Bill of Rights without legislative\u003cbr\u003eguidance? And what are the criteria for the highest standards of judging and constitutional\u003cbr\u003einterpretation? The authors also discuss how and why the Constitution came to\u003cbr\u003ebe embattled, shining a spotlight on the current polarization in both the\u003cbr\u003eSupreme Court and the American body politic and offering careful and informed\u003cbr\u003eanalysis of how to bridge these divides.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eContributors include\u003cbr\u003eMarsha S. Berzon, Michael Boudin, Stephen Breyer, Guido Calabresi, Robert H.\u003cbr\u003eHenry, Robert Katzmann, Pierre N. Leval, M. Blane Michael, Davis S. Tatel, J.\u003cbr\u003eHarvie Wilkinson, III, and Diane P. Wood.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Norman Dorsen","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088879333627,"sku":"9780814785836","price":55.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_c13987eb-5f60-482f-8183-cf814652176f.jpg?v=1770442734"},{"product_id":"latcrit-9781479809325","title":"LatCrit","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eExamines LatCrit’s emergence as a scholarly and activist community within and beyond the US legal academy\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eEmerging from the US legal academy in 1995, LatCrit theory is a genre of critical outsider jurisprudence—a vital hub of contemporary scholarship that includes Feminist Legal Theory and Critical Race Theory, among other critical schools of legal knowledge. Its basic goals have been: (1) to develop a critical, activist, and inter-disciplinary discourse on law and society affecting Latinas\/os\/x, and (2) to foster both the development of coalitional theory and practice as well as the accessibility of this knowledge to agents of social and legal transformative change.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis slim volume tells the story of LatCrit’s growth and influence as a scholarly and activist community. Francisco Valdes and Steven W. Bender offer a living example of how critical outsider academics can organize long-term collective action, both in law and society, that will help those similarly inclined to better organize themselves. Part roadmap, part historical record, and part a path forward, \u003ci\u003eLatCrit: \u003c\/i\u003e\u003ci\u003eFrom Critical Legal Theory to Academic Activism\u003c\/i\u003eshows that with coalition, collaboration, and community, social transformation can take root.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Francisco Valdes","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088879464699,"sku":"9781479809325","price":21.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_346de302-e6af-4ca0-b269-21881e0247d5.jpg?v=1785161703"},{"product_id":"the-empire-strikes-back-9780814705377","title":"The Empire Strikes Back","description":"\u003cp\u003eOnce dismissed as plodding and superfluous, legal scholarship is increasingly challenging the liberal white male establishment that currently dominates legal education and practice. The most significant development since the emergence of the casebook, at the turn of the century, this trend has unleashed a fierce political struggle. At stake is nothing less than the entire enterprise of law and education, and thus a powerful platform from which to shape society.\u003cbr\u003e The result, here vividly recounted by Arthur Austin, has been an uncompromising, take-no-prisoners fight for dominance. The challenge comes from Outsiders, a collection of feminists, critical race theorists, and critical legal studies scholars who rely on unconventional methods such as storytelling to give voice to the underrepresented. In the other, demographically larger camp resides the monolithic Empire, consisting of traditionalists who, having developed an effective form of scholarship, now circle the wagons against the outsider heathens.\u003cbr\u003e Neither partisan nor objective, Austin is both respectful and critical of each faction. The Empire, he believes, is imperious, closed-minded, and self-perpetuating; the Outsiders are too often paranoid, anti-pragmatic, and overly tolerant of fringe work. Is the new scholarship a vacuous, overpoliticized, soon-to-be-vanquished trend or the harbinger of an important new paradigm? Is reconciliation possible? Anyone with a vested interest in the answer to these questions, and in the future of law, cannot afford to miss Arthur Austin's invaluable volume.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Arthur D. Austin","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088879694075,"sku":"9780814705377","price":40.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_577cf405-7fa0-404f-92ee-e1ed927a20fb.jpg?v=1770442737"},{"product_id":"the-school-to-prison-pipeline-9780814748442","title":"The School-to-Prison Pipeline","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAn in-depth analysis of the legal entry points and remedies in the school-to-prison pipeline\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe “school-to-prison pipeline” is an emerging trend that pushes large numbers of at-risk youth—particularly children of color—out of classrooms and into the juvenile justice system. The policies and practices that contribute to this trend can be seen as a pipeline with many entry points, from under-resourced K-12 public schools, to the over-use of zero-tolerance suspensions and expulsions and to the explosion of policing and arrests in public schools.  The confluence of these practices threatens to prepare an entire generation of children for a future of incarceration.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn this comprehensive study of the relationship between American law and the school-to-prison pipeline, co-authors Catherine Y. Kim, Daniel J. Losen, and Damon T. Hewitt analyze the current state of the law for each entry point on the pipeline and propose legal theories and remedies to challenge them. Using specific state-based examples and case studies, the authors assert that law can be an effective weapon in the struggle to reduce the number of children caught in the pipeline, address the devastating consequences of the pipeline on families and communities, and ensure that our public schools and juvenile justice system further the goals for which they were created: to provide meaningful, safe opportunities for all the nation’s children.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Catherine Y. Kim","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088890376443,"sku":"9780814748442","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_3d32c5b1-b453-4c77-b77d-bf31e65519ac.jpg?v=1785136505"},{"product_id":"just-medicine-9781479888566","title":"Just Medicine","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eOffers an innovative plan to eliminate inequalities in American health care and save the lives they endanger\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e \u003cbr\u003eOver 84,000 black and brown lives are needlessly lost each year due to health disparities: the unfair, unjust, and avoidable differences between the quality and quantity of health care provided to Americans who are members of racial and ethnic minorities and care provided to whites. Health disparities have remained stubbornly entrenched in the American health care system—and in \u003ci\u003eJust Medicine\u003c\/i\u003e  Dayna Bowen Matthew finds that they principally arise from unconscious racial and ethnic biases held by physicians, institutional providers, and their patients.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImplicit bias is the single most important determinant of health and health care disparities. Because we have missed this fact, the money we spend on training providers to become culturally competent, expanding wellness education programs and community health centers, and even expanding access to health insurance will have only a modest effect on reducing health disparities. We will continue to utterly fail in the effort to eradicate health disparities unless we enact strong, evidence-based legal remedies that accurately address implicit and unintentional forms of discrimination, to replace the weak, tepid, and largely irrelevant legal remedies currently available.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOur continued failure to fashion an effective response that purges the effects of implicit bias from American health care, Matthew argues, is unjust and morally untenable. In this book, she unites medical, neuroscience, psychology, and sociology research on implicit bias and health disparities with her own expertise in civil rights and constitutional law. In a time when the health of the entire nation is at risk, it is essential to confront the issues keeping the health care system from providing equal treatment to all.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Dayna Bowen Matthew","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088890409211,"sku":"9781479888566","price":19.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_4c7cb6b1-a8f8-488a-a052-2165e4944c1f.jpg?v=1785137736"},{"product_id":"what-roe-v-wade-should-have-said-9781479824458","title":"What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eA unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortion\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in \u003ci\u003eRoe v. Wade\u003c\/i\u003e struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in \u003ci\u003eDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization\u003c\/i\u003e overturned \u003ci\u003eRoe\u003c\/i\u003e and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, \u003ci\u003eDobbs\u003c\/i\u003e managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOriginally published in 2005, \u003ci\u003eWhat Roe v. Wade Should Have Said\u003c\/i\u003e asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the \u003ci\u003eRoe\u003c\/i\u003e litigation—and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it—and explains the\u003ci\u003e Dobbs\u003c\/i\u003e decision and its aftermath.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Jack M. Balkin","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088897585403,"sku":"9781479824458","price":19.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_0122bde5-2936-469e-8313-e37e4258502d.jpg?v=1789532298"},{"product_id":"privilege-revealed-9781479825202","title":"Privilege Revealed","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAn in-depth examination of the different forms of privilege perpetuating inequality within American society\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn this era of #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter, inequality is at the forefront of American thought like never before. Yet many of the systems of privilege upholding the status quo remain unchanged. Many Americans who advocate a merit-based, race-free worldview do not acknowledge the systems of privilege which benefit them. Men remain at the top of the gender wage gap and white people are five times less likely to be stopped by police than their Black neighbors. White families can build lives using social and financial inheritances that have been denied to Black Americans and immigrants for centuries. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIndividual chapters focus on language, the workplace, the implications of comparing racism and sexism, race-based housing privilege, the dream of diversity and the cycle of exclusion, the rule of law and invisible systems of privilege, and the power of law to transform society.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTwenty-five years since its first publication, \u003ci\u003ePrivilege Revealed\u003c\/i\u003e is more relevant than ever. With a new preface and substantive foreword, this book offers readers important insight into the inequalities still pervading American society and encourages us all to confront our own relationship to these too often invisible privileges.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Stephanie M. Wildman","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48088904433915,"sku":"9781479825202","price":28.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_8a3c2bd4-e40c-44ae-81a2-fbb448c7d1fe.jpg?v=1784891693"},{"product_id":"states-of-confusion-9781479807949","title":"States of Confusion","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eShows the maddening difficulties that voter ID requirements create for participants in US democracy and offers concrete solutions for every person’s vote and voice to count\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOver the past decade, and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of voter ID laws has skyrocketed, limiting the ability of nearly twenty-five million eligible voters from exercising their constitutional right to cast a vote. In\u003ci\u003e States of Confu\u003c\/i\u003esion, Don Waisanen, Sonia Jarvis, and Nicole Gordon explore this crisis and the difficulties it has created for American voters, offering practical solutions for this increasingly important problem. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFocusing on ten states with the strictest voter documentation requirements, the authors show how people face major barriers to exercising their fundamental democratic right to vote and are therefore slipping through the cracks of our electoral system. They explore voter experiences by drawing on hundreds of online surveys, audits of 150 election offices, community focus groups, and more. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWaisanen, Jarvis, and Gordon call on policymakers to adopt uniform national voter identification standards that are simple, accessible, and cost-free. \u003ci\u003eStates of Confusion\u003c\/i\u003e offers a comprehensive and up-to-date look at the voter ID crisis in our country, as well solutions for practitioners, government agencies, and citizens.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Don Waisanen","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089268781307,"sku":"9781479807949","price":23.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_d4f134e1-dc5a-4dd4-b147-489e06f6e8fb.jpg?v=1785161586"},{"product_id":"ages-of-anxiety-9781479816675","title":"Ages of Anxiety","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSix compelling histories of youth crime in the twentieth century \u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAges of Anxiety presents six case studies of juvenile justice policy in the twentieth century from around the world, adding context to the urgent and international conversation about youth, crime, and justice.  By focusing on magistrates, social workers, probation and police officers, and youth themselves, editors William S. Bush and David S. Tanenhaus highlight the role of ordinary people as meaningful and consequential historical actors.   \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAfter providing an international perspective on the social history of ideas about how children are different from adults, the contributors explain why those differences should matter for the administration of justice. They examine how reformers used the idea of modernization to build and legitimize juvenile justice systems in Europe and Mexico, and present histories of policing and punishing youth crime.  \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAges of Anxiety introduces a new theoretical model for interpreting historical research to demonstrate the usefulness of social histories of children and youth for policy analysis and decision-making in the twenty-first century. Shedding new light on the substantive aims of the juvenile court, the book is a historically informed perspective on the critical topic of youth, crime, and justice.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"William S. Bush","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089268814075,"sku":"9781479816675","price":38.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_d2e7afec-06ff-4808-8f48-46942e1d142b.jpg?v=1785146813"},{"product_id":"the-digital-person-9780814741184","title":"The Digital Person","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eA startling account of personal data dossiers and the newest grave threat to privacy\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSeven days a week, twenty-four hours a day, electronic databases are compiling information about you. As you surf the Internet, an unprecedented amount of your personal information is being recorded and preserved forever in the digital minds of computers. For each individual, these databases create a profile of activities, interests, and preferences used to investigate backgrounds, check credit, market products, and make a wide variety of decisions affecting our lives. The creation and use of these databases—which Daniel J. Solove calls “digital dossiers”—has thus far gone largely unchecked. In this startling account of new technologies for gathering and using personal data, Solove explains why digital dossiers pose a grave threat to our privacy.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe Digital Person\u003c\/b\u003e sets forth a new understanding of what privacy is, one that is appropriate for the new challenges of the Information Age. Solove recommends how the law can be reformed to simultaneously protect our privacy and allow us to enjoy the benefits of our increasingly digital world.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis is the first volume in the series EX MACHINA: LAW, TECHNOLOGY, AND SOCIETY.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Daniel J Solove","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089268846843,"sku":"9780814741184","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_5feb42cb-c320-45f3-b884-6dc548df8152.jpg?v=1770443058"},{"product_id":"faith-and-law-9780814716984","title":"Faith and Law","description":"\u003cp\u003eThe relationship between religion and the law is a hot-button topic in America, with the courts, Congress, journalists, and others engaging in animated debates on what influence, if any, the former should have on the latter. Many of these discussions are dominated by the legal perspective, which views religion as a threat to the law; it is rare to hear how various religions in America view American law, even though most religions have distinct views on law.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eIn Faith and Law\u003c\/b\u003e, legal scholars from sixteen different religious traditions contend that religious discourse has an important function in the making, practice, and adjudication of American law, not least because our laws rest upon a framework of religious values. The book includes faiths that have traditionally had an impact on American law, as well as new immigrant faiths that are likely to have a growing influence. Each contributor describes how his or her tradition views law and addresses one legal issue from that perspective. Topics include abortion, gay rights, euthanasia, immigrant rights, and blasphemy and free speech.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Robert F. Cochran, Jr.","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089268977915,"sku":"9780814716984","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_499d5918-4806-4d0d-a12f-72bdbb2f16e4.jpg?v=1789532062"},{"product_id":"citizen-and-pariah-9781776147427","title":"Citizen and Pariah","description":"\u003ci\u003eCitizen and Pariah \u003c\/i\u003eexplores the fragility of law, pluralism and democracy in South Africa by investigating Somali informal shopkeepers’ experiences of crime, justice and regulation in the country. Through a narrative account of their local experiences, the book sheds light on the legal and political predicaments they face.","brand":"Vanya Gastrow","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089269240059,"sku":"9781776147427","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_0b75dac1-5fcc-4279-aff5-8a130fc61410.jpg?v=1770443062"},{"product_id":"the-supreme-court-footnote-9781479830237","title":"The Supreme Court Footnote","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFinalist, 2025 PROSE Awards: Legal Studies and Criminology\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA history of the humble footnote and its impact on the highest court in the land\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn May 2022, a seismic legal event occurred as the draft majority opinion in \u003ci\u003eDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health\u003c\/i\u003e was leaked. The majority aimed to eliminate constitutional protection for abortion. Amidst the fervor, an unnoticed detail emerged: over 140 footnotes accompanied the majority opinion and dissent. These unassuming annotations held immense significance, unveiling justices’ beliefs about the Constitution’s essence, highlighting their controversial reasoning, and laying bare the vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003eThe Supreme Court Footnote \u003c\/i\u003eoffers a study of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and how they add to our constitutional understanding. Through a comprehensive analysis, Peter Charles Hoffer argues that as justices alter the course of history via their decisions, they import their own understandings of it through the footnotes. The book showcases how the role of the footnote within Supreme Court opinions has evolved, beginning with one of the first cases in the history of the court, \u003ci\u003eChisholm v. Georgia\u003c\/i\u003e in 1792 (a case concerning federalism vs. states’ rights) and ending with the landmark \u003ci\u003eDobbs v. Jackson\u003c\/i\u003e case in 2022. Along the way, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes within these decisions reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court Justice, along with how interpretations of the constitution have transformed over time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAt once surprising and revealing, \u003ci\u003eThe Supreme Court Footnote\u003c\/i\u003e proves that what appears below the line is not only a unique window into the history of constitutional law but also a source of insight as to how the court will act going forward.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Peter Charles Hoffer","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089272451323,"sku":"9781479830237","price":21.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_4526a04d-9c44-4975-b9e9-4d46b53e0cc4.jpg?v=1789186357"},{"product_id":"feminist-legal-history-9780814787212","title":"Feminist Legal History","description":"\u003cp\u003eAttuned to the social contexts within which laws are created, feminist lawyers, historians, and activists have long recognized the discontinuities and contradictions that lie at the heart of efforts to transform the law in ways that fully serve women’s interests. At its core, the nascent field of feminist legal history is driven by a commitment to uncover women’s legal agency and how women, both historically and currently, use law to obtain individual and societal empowerment.\u003cbr\u003eFeminist Legal History represents feminist legal historians’ efforts to define their field, by showcasing historical research and analysis that demonstrates how women were denied legal rights, how women used the law proactively to gain rights, and how, empowered by law, women worked to alter the law to try to change gendered realities. Encompassing two centuries of American history, thirteen original essays expose the many ways in which legal decisions have hinged upon ideas about women or gender as well as the ways women themselves have intervened in the law, from Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s notion of a legal class of gender to the deeply embedded inequities involved in Ledbetter v. Goodyear, a 2007 Supreme Court pay discrimination case.\u003cbr\u003eContributors: Carrie N. Baker, Felice Batlan, Tracey Jean Boisseau, Eileen Boris, Richard H. Chused, Lynda Dodd, Jill Hasday, Gwen Hoerr Jordan, Maya Manian, Melissa Murray, Mae C. Quinn, Margo Schlanger, Reva Siegel, Tracy A. Thomas, and Leti Volpp\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Tracy A. Thomas","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089272680699,"sku":"9780814787212","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_6fec35f0-a8da-47fb-bac4-ab5f3f70d2d9.jpg?v=1784891764"},{"product_id":"morality-imposed-9780814732700","title":"Morality Imposed","description":"\u003cp\u003eWe like to think of judges and justices as making decisions based on the facts and the law. But to what extent do jurists decide cases in accordance with their own preexisting philosophy of law, and what specific ideological assumptions account for their decisions?\u003cbr\u003e Stephen E. Gottlieb adopts a unique perspective on the decision-making of Supreme Court justices, blending and re-characterizing traditional accounts of political philosophy in a way that plausibly explains many of the justices' voting patterns. \u003cbr\u003e A seminal study of the Rehnquist Court,\u003cb\u003e Morality Imposed\u003c\/b\u003e illustrates how, in contrast to previous courts which took their mandate to be a move toward a freer and\/or happier society, the current court evidences little concern for this goal, focusing instead on thinly veiled moral judgments. Delineating a fault line between liberal and conservative justices on the Rehnquist Court, Gottlieb suggests that conservative justices have rejected the basic principles that informed post-New Deal individual rights jurisprudence and have substituted their own conceptions of moral character for these fundamental principles.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eMorality Imposed\u003c\/b\u003e adds substantially to our understanding of the Supreme Court, its most recent cases, and the evolution of judicial philosophy in the U.S.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Stephen E. Gottlieb","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089374064891,"sku":"9780814732700","price":45.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_b2e009a3-fdd7-4c4d-97a7-231f8e008744.jpg?v=1784891119"},{"product_id":"legal-canons-9780814739464","title":"Legal Canons","description":"\u003cp\u003eEvery discipline has its canon: the set of standard texts, approaches, examples, and stories by which it is recognized and which its members repeatedly invoke and employ. Although the last twenty-five years have seen the influence of interdisciplinary approaches to legal studies expand, there has been little recent consideration of what is and what ought to be canonical in the study of law today.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eLegal Canons\u003c\/b\u003e brings together fifteen essays which seek to map out the legal canon and the way in which law is taught today. In order to understand how the twin ideas of canons and canonicity operate in law, each essay focuses on a particular aspect, from contracts and constitutional law to questions of race and gender. The ascendance of law and economics, feminism, critical race theory, and gay legal studies, as well as the increasing influence of both rational-actor methodology and postmodernism, are all scrutinized by the leading scholars in the field.\u003cbr\u003e A timely and comprehensive volume, \u003cb\u003eLegal Canons\u003c\/b\u003e articulates the need for, and means to, opening the debate on canonicity in legal studies.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eTable of Contents\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Jack M. Balkin","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089381077243,"sku":"9780814739464","price":45.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_9a5acad3-0434-4d8d-845f-e92a79c25ee9.jpg?v=1785136360"},{"product_id":"centering-families-of-color-9781479833337","title":"Centering Families of Color","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCenters families of color in family law, revealing their pivotal role in shaping justice, equality, and social change and how their perspectives reframe the scope of family law\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003eCentering Families of Color\u003c\/i\u003e argues for the reframing of how we define “family law.” Centering the voices and perspectives of families of color, it expands and contextualizes how the law functions in relation to families. It exposes the impact of structural inequalities as they differentially and hierarchically impact families. This groundbreaking volume thus reorients how we think of family law, offering the experiences of families of color as critical to both the diagnoses and solutions for structural inequality.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile conventional treatment of families of color marginalizes their role socially and politically as add-ons, this volume centers them as essential. Leading scholars across disciplinary groups unearth and expose the hidden norms of family law, identify the critical history of how the law impacts families of color, and detail their dynamic contributions to social transformation. Families of color offer affirmative, resilient strategies for social justice and reform.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAt a time of diversity among families and dramatic changes in the pattern of life, this volume provides a critical examination of the legal structures that impact families from the much-needed perspective of families of color. \u003ci\u003eCentering Families of Color\u003c\/i\u003e showcases how families of color are central to understanding what family is and how families interact with the law.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"R. A. Lenhardt","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089384550651,"sku":"9781479833337","price":25.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_ba4bd336-905b-474c-9c8b-a92bc6e67c98.jpg?v=1791432756"},{"product_id":"courting-change-9780814776414","title":"Courting Change","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eWinner of the 2010 Pacific Sociological Association Distinguished Contribution to Scholarship Award\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA lesbian couple rears a child together and, after the biological mother dies, the surviving partner loses custody to the child’s estranged biological father. Four days later, in a different court, judges rule on the side of the partner, because they feel the child relied on the woman as a “psychological parent.” What accounts for this inconsistency regarding gay and lesbian adoption and custody cases, and why has family law failed to address them in a comprehensive manner?\u003cbr\u003eIn \u003cb\u003eCourting Change\u003c\/b\u003e, Kimberly D. Richman zeros in on the nebulous realm of family law, one of the most indeterminate and discretionary areas of American law. She focuses on judicial decisions—both the outcomes and the rationales—and what they say about family, rights, sexual orientation, and who qualifies as a parent. Richman challenges prevailing notions that gay and lesbian parents and families are hurt by laws’ indeterminacy, arguing that, because family law is so loosely defined, it allows for the flexibility needed to respond to—and even facilitate — changes in how we conceive of family, parenting, and the role of sexual orientation in family law.\u003cbr\u003eDrawing on every recorded judicial decision in gay and lesbian adoption and custody cases over the last fifty years, and on interviews with parents, lawyers, and judges, Richman demonstrates how parental and sexual identities are formed and interpreted in law, and how gay and lesbian parents can harness indeterminacy to transform family law.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Kimberly D. Richman","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089388318971,"sku":"9780814776414","price":30.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_0662a303-130c-4e37-96e0-e02bd8225411.jpg?v=1784890882"},{"product_id":"terrible-stuff-damaging-everybody-9781479833023","title":"Terrible Stuff Damaging Everybody","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe definitive story of Dominion v. Fox, the battle over election lies that changed the future of democracy\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eDominion Voting Systems v. Fox News Network\u003c\/i\u003e is the watershed media case of the century. After an onslaught of attacks by several Fox News hosts and guests insisting that Dominion’s voting machines were rigged to steal the 2020 presidential election from Donald Trump, the previously little-known voting technology company decided to fight back. Over the next two years, their libel litigation laid bare the inner workings of the seemingly unassailable Fox Corporation and the thoughts of the media conglomerate’s most high-profile stars, guests, and executives.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOn the morning the trial was set to begin, the parties reached an unprecedented settlement of $787.5 million. The media lamented that secrets from Fox’s top talent and owners would never come to light, but now the full, shocking truth has finally been revealed. \u003ci\u003eTerrible Stuff Damaging Everybody \u003c\/i\u003eexposes the true story of the election lies that shook Fox News and the nation. Media lawyer and author Ian Rosenberg transforms thousands of pages of legal documents into a compelling behind-the-scenes narrative. He presents the saga as a riveting three act drama that answers the vital questions: why Fox News broadcasted flagrantly false claims about election fraud; what the legal action uncovered about Fox’s power structure and the actual malice standard; and how the aftermath will fundamentally impact the future of libel law, the media, and our democracy.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eTerrible Stuff Damaging Everybody\u003c\/i\u003e provides a clear-eyed, expert analysis of this history-making lawsuit, and what it means for our country today.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Ian Rosenberg","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089399066875,"sku":"9781479833023","price":25.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_e081cb13-8ce4-4023-bdf5-ba02dd4dd0a3.jpg?v=1790050352"},{"product_id":"lives-in-the-balance-9781479865987","title":"Lives in the Balance","description":"\u003cp\u003eAlthough Americans generally think that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is focused only on preventing terrorism, one office within that agency has a humanitarian mission. Its Asylum Office adjudicates applications from people fleeing persecution in their homelands. Lives in the Balance is a careful empirical analysis of how Homeland Security decided these asylum cases over a recent fourteen-year period.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDay in and day out, asylum officers make decisions with life-or-death consequences: determining which applicants are telling the truth and are at risk of persecution in their home countries, and which are ineligible for refugee status in America. In Lives in the Balance, the authors analyze a database of 383,000 cases provided to them by the government in order to better understand the effect on grant rates of a host of factors unrelated to the merits of asylum claims, including the one-year filing deadline, whether applicants entered the United States with a visa, whether applicants had dependents, whether they were represented, how many asylum cases their adjudicator had previously decided, and whether or not their adjudicator was a lawyer. The authors also examine the degree to which decisions were consistent among the eight regional asylum offices and within each of those offices. The authors’ recommendations­, including repeal of the one-year deadline­, would improve the adjudication process by reducing the impact of non-merits factors on asylum decisions. If adopted by the government, these proposals would improve the accuracy of outcomes for those whose lives hang in the balance.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Philip G. Schrag","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089399132411,"sku":"9781479865987","price":50.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_684b9f97-6c7c-42dd-bc05-ccefabc2981d.jpg?v=1770443193"},{"product_id":"the-new-deportations-delirium-9781479873760","title":"The New Deportations Delirium","description":"\u003cp\u003eSince 1996, when the deportation laws were hardened, millions of migrants to the U.S., including many long-term legal permanent residents with “green cards,” have experienced summary arrest, incarceration without bail, transfer to remote detention facilities, and deportation without counsel—a life-time banishment from what is, in many cases, the only country they have ever known. U.S.-based families and communities face the loss of a worker, neighbor, spouse, parent, or child. Many of the deported are “sentenced home” to a country which they only knew as an infant, whose language they do not speak, or where a family lives in extreme poverty or indebtedness for not yet being able to pay the costs of their previous migration. But what does this actually look like and what are the systems and processes and who are the people who are enforcing deportation policies and practices? The New Deportations Delirium responds to these questions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTaken as a whole, the volume raises consciousness about the complexities of the issues and argues for the interdisciplinary dialogue and response. Over the course of the book, deportation policy is debated by lawyers, judges, social workers, researchers, and clinical and community psychologists as well as educators, researchers, and community activists. The New Deportations Delirium presents a fresh conversation and urges a holistic response to the complex realities facing not only migrants but also the wider U.S. society in which they have sought a better life.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Daniel Kanstroom","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089406275835,"sku":"9781479873760","price":42.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_7266e276-01d1-43d0-ba06-3f6ae25f56ee.jpg?v=1785146758"},{"product_id":"the-measure-of-injury-9780814717332","title":"The Measure of Injury","description":"\u003cp\u003eTort law is the body of law governing negligence, intentional misconduct, and other wrongful acts for which civil actions can be brought. The conventional wisdom is that the rules, concepts, and structures of tort law are neutral and unbiased, free of considerations of gender and race.\u003cbr\u003eIn \u003cb\u003eThe Measure of Injury\u003c\/b\u003e, Martha Chamallas and Jennifer Wriggins prove that tort law is anything but gender and race neutral. Drawing on an in-depth analysis of case law ranging from the Jim Crow South to the 9\/11 Victim Compensation Fund, the authors demonstrate that women and minorities have been under-compensated in tort law and that traditional biases have resurfaced in updated forms to perpetuate patterns of disparate recovery based on race and gender. Grappling with tort theory, the intricacies of legal doctrine and the practical effects of legal rules, \u003cb\u003eThe Measure of Injury\u003c\/b\u003e is a unique treatise on torts that uncovers the public and cultural dimensions of this always-controversial domain of private law.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Martha Chamallas","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089406472443,"sku":"9780814717332","price":45.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_5219c35f-11a5-40c0-b818-8a4d4fb9960f.jpg?v=1785136885"},{"product_id":"understanding-harm-9781479834334","title":"Understanding Harm","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eExamines broad political theoretical issues while exploring injuries associated with poverty, discrimination, sexual harassment, and disabling injury\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e“Do No Harm.” Generally speaking, our society’s commitment to this principle has grounded its system of ethics, legal rules, and policies. Yet, in the context of the law, determining what it means for people to be harmed is a much more complex theoretical question.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eUnderstanding Harm\u003c\/i\u003e, legal scholar Mark Kelman expands our contemporary legal and moral understandings of injury and welfare, directly addressing what it means for people to be well or badly off. Engaging with political theory, legal analysis, and empirical findings, Kelman examines how and why people may (or may not) be harmed by disability, poverty, discrimination, and sexual harassment. He provides a comprehensive exploration of how individuals who have been harmed by unjust social practices or the bad acts of others are often injured through the lack of adequate accommodations, restrictions on access to material resources, or economic disadvantages. In doing so, he sharply critiques current legal approaches to injury, examining the intricacies of modern harm-inducing practices. Providing a fresh perspective on today’s most pressing societal issues, \u003ci\u003eUnderstanding Harm\u003c\/i\u003e calls for readers to rethink our approach to harm, and to question what can, and should, be done for people who have been harmed.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Mark G. Kelman","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089406734587,"sku":"9781479834334","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_f131f2ba-c2a8-484e-a085-6cc6eaaa9e79.jpg?v=1784866225"},{"product_id":"americans-without-law-9780814795095","title":"Americans Without Law","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAmericans Without Law\u003c\/b\u003e shows how the racial boundaries of civic life are based on widespread perceptions about the relative capacity of minority groups for legal behavior, which Mark S. Weiner calls “juridical racialism.” The book follows the history of this civic discourse by examining the legal status of four minority groups in four successive historical periods: American Indians in the 1880s, Filipinos after the Spanish-American War, Japanese immigrants in the 1920s, and African Americans in the 1940s and 1950s.\u003cbr\u003eWeiner reveals the significance of juridical racialism for each group and, in turn, Americans as a whole by examining the work of anthropological social scientists who developed distinctive ways of understanding racial and legal identity, and through decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court that put these ethno-legal views into practice. Combining history, anthropology, and legal analysis, the book argues that the story of juridical racialism shows how race and citizenship served as a nexus for the professionalization of the social sciences, the growth of national state power, economic modernization, and modern practices of the self.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Mark S. Weiner","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089406800123,"sku":"9780814795095","price":28.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_927307ab-45e4-45db-8392-50ff11832abd.jpg?v=1784927882"},{"product_id":"regulating-conception-9781479831531","title":"Regulating Conception","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eUncovers the hidden federal regulation of assisted reproductive technology and reproductive genetic innovation \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has become increasingly prevalent in society, with approximately 42% of American adults reporting in 2023 that they or someone they know has undergone fertility treatment. Yet, while traditional ART techniques like artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization (IVF) have led to the birth of millions of children worldwide, their use and research has remained contested within the American regulatory sphere. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eRegulating Conception\u003c\/i\u003e, Myrisha S. Lewis assesses the moral, political and social issues that influence the federal regulation of ART and reproductive genetic innovation. Contrasting the prevailing viewpoint that ART is “minimally regulated,” Lewis uncovers how ART techniques that combine IVF with genetic modification or substitution face hidden regulations from federal agencies that curtail access to reproductive genetic innovation. Though the jurisdictional basis of these agency actions has never been clearly articulated, agency employees continue to use agency-issued letters and advisories to deter practitioners of reproductive genetic innovation. In doing so, these actions limit access to life-altering reproductive technologies in the United States and further disparities in access to assisted reproduction. Exposing the extent of over-regulation assisted reproduction in the US, \u003ci\u003eRegulating Conception\u003c\/i\u003e urges the minimal regulation of assisted reproduction and reproductive genetic innovation in place of clandestine regulation, to increase transparency and safeguard reproductive rights.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Myrisha S. Lewis","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089406931195,"sku":"9781479831531","price":32.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_18f90c0f-350b-4efd-94d3-005c38651908.jpg?v=1776917661"},{"product_id":"neoconservative-politics-and-the-supreme-court-9780814770764","title":"Neoconservative Politics and the Supreme Court","description":"\u003cp\u003eIn this concise, timely book, constitutional law expert Stephen M. Feldman draws on neoconservative writings to explore the rise of the neocons and their influence on the Supreme Court. Neocons burst onto the political scene in the early 1980s via their assault on pluralist democracy’s ethical relativism, where no pre-existing or higher principles limit the agendas of interest groups. Instead, they advocated for a resurrection of republican democracy, which declares that virtuous citizens and officials pursue the common good. Yet despite their original goals, neocons quickly became an interest group themselves, competing successfully within the pluralist democratic arena. When the political winds shifted in 2008, however, neocons found themselves shorn of power in Congress and the executive branch. But portentously, they\u003cbr\u003estill controlled the Supreme Court. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNeoconservative Politics and the Supreme Court explains how and why the neoconservatives criticized but operated within pluralist democracy, and, most important, what the entrenchment of neocons on the Supreme Court means for present and future politics and law.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Stephen M. Feldman","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089410797819,"sku":"9780814770764","price":50.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_b60385bb-333b-40ea-a628-248a4c2f2620.jpg?v=1785135109"},{"product_id":"menstruation-matters-9781479809691","title":"Menstruation Matters","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eExplores the burgeoning menstrual advocacy movement and analyzes how law should evolve to take menstruation into account.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApproximately half the population menstruates for a large portion of their lives, but the law is mostly silent about the topic. Until recently, most people would have said that periods are private matters not to be discussed in public. But the last few years have seen a new willingness among advocates and allies of all ages to speak openly about periods. Slowly around the globe, people are recognizing the basic fundamental human right to address menstruation in a safe and affordable way, free of stigma, shame, or barriers to access.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003eMenstruation Matters\u003c\/i\u003e explores the role of law in this movement. It asks what the law currently says about menstruation (spoiler alert: not much) and provides a roadmap for legal reform that can move society closer to a world where no one is held back or disadvantaged by menstruation. Bridget J. Crawford and Emily Gold Waldman examine these issues in a wide range of contexts, from schools to workplaces to prisons to tax policies and more.  Ultimately, they seek to transform both law and society so that menstruation is no longer an obstacle to full participation in all aspects of public and private life.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Bridget J. Crawford","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48089414467835,"sku":"9781479809691","price":16.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_4761b279-b781-45c2-93c6-52d8ac42d175.jpg?v=1789186356"}],"url":"https:\/\/indiepubs.com\/collections\/law.oembed?page=101","provider":"IndiePubs","version":"1.0","type":"link"}