{"product_id":"recueil-des-cours-collected-courses-tome-445-9789004741720","title":"Recueil des cours, Collected Courses, Tome 445","description":"Andrés RODRÍGUEZ BENOT, Le régime économique des couples en droit international privé\u003cbr\u003e\nLa communauté de vie pendant le mariage ou le partenariat enregistré produit des effets patrimoniaux qui peuvent se projeter soit au plan interne entre les conjoints ou les partenaires, soit à l'égard des tiers. L'institution du régime patrimonial du couple est l'une des plus complexes qui soient en droit interne et en droit comparé. Ses difficultés se multiplient à l'échelle internationale lorsqu'un mariage ou un partenariat sont rattachés à au moins deux systèmes juridiques pour des raisons personnelles, matérielles, territoriales ou formelles.\u003cbr\u003e\nAfin d'aborder cette institution de manière systématique et actualisée, le présent ouvrage analyse, entre autres, les efforts déployés pour sa codification et ses perspectives procédurale, de fond ou \u003ci\u003ead intra\u003c\/i\u003e (aspects substantiels et conflictuels) et ad extra (rapports avec les tiers). L'objectif de cet ouvrage est de fournir aux juristes – théoriciens comme praticiens – les éléments permettant une compréhension complète de la matière du point de vue international et comparé.\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\nP. J. MARTINEZ-FRAGA, Settlement and Risk Assessment in International Commercial Arbitration\u003cbr\u003e\nIn the name of “efficiency” international commercial arbitration stakeholders have agreed to forego (i) second instance review, (ii) fulsome due process, (iii) transparency in exchange for privacy, (iv) finality over accuracy, (v) the number of parties to a dispute pursuant to a principle of consent that constraints the number of parties to a proceeding, (vi) \u003ci\u003eFree Proof\u003c\/i\u003e over strict evidential principles and exclusionary rules, and (vii) party appointment of decision-making over the appearance of objective process legitimacy.\u003cbr\u003e\nIn the context of these concessions, it is necessary to ask whether international commercial arbitration (ICA) has redeemed its promise to be efficient when less than 40% of all ICA proceedings settle?  If the answer to this query is in the negative, how then, are merits-based adjudications more in keeping with ICA’s core principle of party-autonomy instead of resolution pursuant to settlement and mutual accord?  Can resolution pursuant to a \u003ci\u003ezero-sum game\u003c\/i\u003e by dint of third-party adjudication redeem ICA’s promise to be efficient?  Is not settlement by mutual consent the most fulsome exercise of party-autonomy?\u003cbr\u003e\nThe discussion focuses on revisiting ICA procedural and evidential frameworks to explore ways in which settlement, here defined as \u003ci\u003eoptimal efficiency\u003c\/i\u003e, may be maximized.  It does so by examining whether and the extent to which ICA’s current procedure and evidential frameworks provide for the necessary risk assessment conducive to optimal efficiency:  settlement.","brand":"Hague Academy of International Law","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48310445441275,"sku":"9789004741720","price":199.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0779\/3917\/9771\/files\/CoreSourceHub_57945bff-e861-4bb9-b91c-e9192c68620c.jpg?v=1779405141","url":"https:\/\/indiepubs.com\/products\/recueil-des-cours-collected-courses-tome-445-9789004741720","provider":"IndiePubs","version":"1.0","type":"link"}