``Brown examines meticulously and even-handedly the scholarly controversy which followed Smith's announcement of this discovery, and his key conclusions are worth noting with care....This book will prove invaluable, particularly to readers who do not have access to the information on which to assess one of the more unseemly scholarly controversies of recent decades. Brown's reconstruction of the history behind the longer version of Mark will merit serious engagement in scholarship.''

``Brown offers a thorough, dispassionate, and meticulously researched defence of the likely authenticity of the Clement of Alexander letter. At a minimum, Brown makes a persuasive case that--scholarly bombast aside--forgery has not been proven.''
— Ian Hunter,

``This work ... provides a sustained reading of LGM [Longer Mark] that is, especially in comparison to the usual tone of work on this topic, innovative and intriguing, with a noticeable lack of hyperbole. This analysis aside, many (if not most) readers will find their attention drawn chiefly to the debate over the authenticity of the Letter to Theodore, and this section of the book deserves attention for several reasons. Regardless of whether Carlson or Brown makes the most compelling case, the issue often biols down to discussions of whether Morton Smith was `the sort of person' to fabricate material (both in terms of capability and character). In this regard, Brown's use of Internet blogs, e-mail exchanges and the curious sort of interplay between personal and academic materials such as a debate requires demonstrates the liminal nature of scholarly argumentation as to `character.' Scholarly credibility is often a fuzzier issue than we scholars admit, and when Brown notes that Jacob Neusner's views about Smith, oft-quoted in this debate, are not those of a dispassionate observer who is himself above criticism (pp. 38-48), the interplay of personality and scholarship is at its most interesting. The role of the academic rumour-mill (with its attendant jealousies and conflicts of personalities) is rarely so openly discussed, and it may be that the entire debate over LGM will serve to shed light on this much-ignored side of scholarship, which is a discussion worth having aside from the issue of Smith's controversial discovery.''
— Matthew W. Mitchell

``Mark's Other Gospel by Scott Brown critically examines not only the controversy surrounding Smith's find, but the excerpts themselves and, as such, is a necessary addition to early Christian studies.... The work is thorough and well written in spite of the complexity of the subject matter. In the least, Mark's Other Gospel demands that scholars take the Letter to Theodore and its 15 additional Markan verses seriously. At best, Brown demonstrates that a slightly different version of the Gospel of Mark was used amongst those few Alexandrians who were mature in their faith.''
— Dilys Patterson

``Scott G. Brown's fine book ... makes a real contribution to scholarship. First he provides a transcript of the Greek text and an English translation of bothe Clement's `Letter to Theodore' and citations of the gragments of the `Longer Gospel of Mark.' Then, Brown offers a thorough, balanced, level-headed, and much-needed rethinking of the document, treating the history of scholarly assessments of the text, including whether or not Clement's letter and the gospel fragments are authentic or a forgery (ancient or modern); and if the former, whether these fragments constitute an `apocryphal' pastiche of the canonical gospels, a pre-canoncical version of Mark, a `secret' gnostic gospel, a catechetical supplement for baptism, or (as Brown argues) a longer, esoteric version of Mark's Gospel.... Mark's Other Gospel is a valuable literary and theological study of a text often rejected and long neglected by scholarship. By presenting a sobering critique of how biblical scholarship tends to treat Christian origins, as well as a compelling analysis of how those discoveries might enable us to think Christian origins differently, Brown has given us a no-nonsense example of how we might begin to describe the experimental character of the first chapters of Christian history. For that we should all be grateful.''
— Ron Cameron

``An important contribution to understanding early Christian gospel literature.''

``Ever since Morton Smith's discovery at Mar Saba of a letter by Clement of Alexandria containing fragments of a longer version of Mark, `Secret Mark' has been surrounded by a cloud of controversy and a spate of outlandish and scurrilous accusations by detractors of Smith and the gospel. Brown's monograph combines the first detailed treatment of the history of the discovery with an outstandingly careful and persuasive analysis of the Clementine letter and the gospel fragments it contains. He lifts the discussion of `Longer Mark' from the mire of innuendo and pseudo-scholarly opinion and sets it on the footing of serious and balanced discussion, showing that there are good reasons both to suppose that the Clementine letter is genuine and to conclude that the gospel fragments are Markan. Mark's Other Gospel is not only important for being the first full-length scholarly treatment on `Longer Mark'; it also provides a compelling analysis of how modern scholarship on Christian origins treats discoveries that have the potential to upset the commonly accepted views of gospel origins.''
— John S. Kloppenborg, University of Toronto

Table of Contents for
Mark’s Other Gospel: Rethinking Morton Smith’s Controversial Discovery by Scott G. Brown

Acknowledgments

Preface

List of Abbreviations

The Letter to Theodore

Clement’s Citations from the Longer Gospel

Part One: Rethinking the Dominant Paradigm

Chapter 1: A Longer, Esoteric Version of Mark’s Gospel

Scholarly Assessments of the Longer Gospel

A Literary Thesis

Chapter 2: The Question of the Authenticity of the Letter to Theodore

The Manuscript

The Possibility of Modern Forgery

The Possibility of Ancient Forgery

Conclusions

Chapter 3: Longer Mark’s Relation to Other Gospels

Longer Mark’s Basis in Oral Tradition

Longer Mark’s Relation to John

Longer Mark’s Relation to Matthew and Luke

Longer Mark’s Relation to Non-Canonical Gospels

Longer Mark’s Relation to Canonical Mark

Chapter 4: The Nature of the Longer Gospel

Clement’s Conception of the Genre of the Longer Gospel

The Reason for the Discretion Surrounding the Use of the Longer Gospel

Conclusions

Chapter 5: The Original Purpose and Later Use of the Longer Gospel

The Baptismal Reading of LGM 1b

The Baptismal Reading of the Letter to Theodore

Alternative Cultic Interpretations

The Need for a Literary Perspective on LGM 1 and 2

The Original Purpose and Later Use of LGM 1 and 2

Conclusions

Part Two: Analysis of Markan Literary Techniques

Chapter 6: Longer Mark’s Use of Intercalation

The Formal Characteristics of Intercalation

The Hermeneutical Significance of Intercalation

Excursus on the Relevance of Intercalation to the Question of the Authenticity of the Letter to Theodore

Chapter 7: Longer Mark’s Use of Framing Stories

What Constitutes an Inclusio?

Do Mark 10:32 and 16:7-8 Create an Inclusio?

LGM 1 and 2 and Mark 16:18 as a Frame for the Passion

Chapter 8: Longer Mark’s Use of Verbal Echoes

Reminiscences of the Man with Many Possessions

“And After Six Days”

The “Great Cry” from the Tomb

“The Mystery of the Kingdom of God”

LGM 1:12 as an Elaboration of Themes Introduced in Mark 4:11-12

The Mystery of the Kingdom of God and the Markan Gospel’s Imperative of Spiritual Understanding

Deeper Understanding as a Literary Agenda Shared by the Longer and Shorter Gospels

Chapter 9: Conclusions

The Nature and Original Purpose of the Longer Gospel

Who Wrote the Longer Gospel?

How and When Was the Longer Gospel Composed?

Longer Mark's Relevance to Scholarship

Notes

Bibliography

Modern Authors Index

Ancient Sources Index

Subject Index