Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
The way in which mainstream human rights discourse speaks of such evils as the Holocaust, slavery, or apartheid puts them solidly in the past. Its elaborate techniques of "transitional" justice encourage future generations to move forward by creating a false assumption of closure, enabling those who are guilty to elude responsibility. This approach to history, common to late-twentieth-century humanitarianism, doesn't presuppose that evil ends when justice begins. Rather, it assumes that a time before justice is the moment to put evil in the past.
Merging examples from literature and history, Robert Meister confronts the problem of closure and the resolution of historical injustice. He boldly challenges the empty moral logic of "never again" or the theoretical reduction of evil to a cycle of violence and counterviolence, broken only once evil is remembered for what it was. Meister criticizes such methods for their deferral of justice and susceptibility to exploitation and elaborates the flawed moral logic of "never again" in relation to Auschwitz and its evolution into a twenty-first-century doctrine of the Responsibility to Protect.
— Choice
Original, subtle, and provocative.
— Debra L. Delaet
After Evil is a large, even magisterial book.... [It] aims to document human rights discourse... as an ideology that transcends any particular instance and operates as a symbolic logic, governing not just international law but our own emotional lives....This ambitious and persuasive book charts human rights as an ethical philosophy, a symbolic relation between subjects, and a pervasive ideology of our own relationship to history.
— Daniel Worden
Robert Meister's central idea is that human rights since the end of the Second World War have provided a limited and problematic response to the phenomenon of political evil—particularly slavery, colonialism, genocide, and ethnic cleansing.... The conclusion that Meister drives home is that human rights as they are understood today reconcile us to the given rather than offering grander visions of justice.... Human rights as we know them today are explicitly intended to limit the promise of justice—both because the horrors of the twentieth century suggest that such promise might come at too high a cost, and because the promise of justice as greater political and social equality is opposed by the post-Cold War powers.
— Joe Hoover
Thoughtful and thought-provoking.
— Claudia Card
[After Evil] contains many brilliant, perceptive and thought provoking insights.
— Survival
Preface: My Task
Introduction: Disavowing Evil
1. The Ideology and Ethics of Human Rights
2. Ways of Winning
3. Living On
4. The Dialectic of Race and Place
5. "Never Again"
6. Still the Jewish Question?
7. Bystanders and Victims
8. Adverse Possession
9. States of "Emergency"
10. Surviving Catastrophe
Conclusion: Justice in Time
Acknowledgments
Notes
References
Index