Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
In the weeks following the 9/11 attacks, the mainstream political elite in Washington, DC acquiesced to every major decision taken by George W. Bush's administration while partisan politics in Congress ceased. As a nation and its representatives rallied around their leader, the diversity of opinions and the role of political opposition seemed suddenly less vital. A similar unity materialized in the aftermath of the attacks on Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, as millions marched across Paris and the "Marseillaise" resonated throughout France.
Emphasizing France's distinctive struggle against terrorism between 1980 and 2016, Bombs, Bullets, and Politicians presents a comparative analysis of how political elites react to terrorist attacks in five western democratic states. Demonstrating that the magnitude and frequency of terrorist acts determines whether political elites rally around the flag or rail against the government, Christophe Chowanietz formulates hypotheses on the likely impact of various patterns of terrorist actions. He first tests these hypotheses quantitatively in relation to an existing database of incidents, and then qualitatively in the effects that terrorist attacks have had in France. Shedding light on the difference in reactions between mainstream, radical, right-wing, and left-wing parties, Chowanietz argues that terrorism never fails to disrupt the political game.
In an age when the news is dominated by terrorist threats and debates on what to do about them, Bombs, Bullets, and Politicians offers a pertinent analysis of the relationship between terrorism and the conduct of the West’s party politics.
“Bombs, Bullets, and Politicians offers a pertinent analysis of the relationship between terrorism and the conduct of Western party politics.” Conference of Defence Associations Institute
“Chowanietz’s findings add a new dimension to studies of counterterrorist policies and practices. No other author has specifically addressed the issue of how terrorist actions impact upon party politics in democracies by marshalling both quantitative and qualitative evidence across a comparative range of countries. He sheds much-needed light on how policies are formed and sustained in the partisan competition that characterizes all western democracies as well as how policy informs and limits the capacity of governments to act in the face of terrorist provocations.” Reg Whitaker, University of Victoria