We're sorry. An error has occurred
Please cancel or retry.
Conceptualising Arbitrary Detention
Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
Couldn't load pickup availability
-
25 June 2024

Available open access digitally under CC-BY-NC-ND licence
This book examines what happens when states and other authorities use detention to abuse their power, deter dissent and maintain social hierarchies.
Written by an author with decades of practical experience in the human rights field, the book examines a variety of scenarios where individuals are unlawfully detained in violation of their most basic rights to personal liberty and exposes the many fallacies associated with arbitrary detention.
Proposing solutions for future policy to scrutinise processes, this is a call for greater respect for the rule of law and human rights.
"This is a fresh reminder that the international community needs to do more to counter arbitrary detention. Ferstman's rigorous analysis determines with clarity and persuasiveness under what precise conditions deprivation of freedom is warranted and when it is a serious violation of universally recognized standards. This book is an enormous contribution to the struggle to uphold those principles, to denounce aberrant recourse to prolonged or widespread detention without trial, and to devise specific and effective remedies in international and in domestic law to preserve the fundamental right to liberty." Juan E. Mendez, American University Washington College of Law and former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture
1. Introduction
Part A: Theorising and Conceptualising “Arbitrariness”
2. Notions of the “Arbitrary”
3. “Arbitrariness” as an Indication of Harm
Part B: The Law and Practise of Arbitrary Detention in Context
4. Enforcing Hostility and Social Control
5. Deterring Dissent
6. The Securitisation of Detention: Exceptional Regimes, Security Frameworks and Counter-Terrorism Measures
7. Detention of Dual and Foreign Nationals for Leverage
8. Detention and Pandemic Exceptionality
9. Conclusions