We're sorry. An error has occurred
Please cancel or retry.
Diversifying the Courts
Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
Couldn't load pickup availability
-
28 February 2023

Examines the decisions of US presidents to appoint judges from diverse backgrounds to federal courts
In Diversifying the Courts, Nancy Scherer addresses why presidents choose—or don’t choose—to diversify the federal courts by race, ethnicity, and gender. She explores how and why the issue became a bitter partisan fight in the first place, tracking the controversial history—and politics—of court diversification.
Drawing on polls, political experiments, surveys and one-on-one interviews, Scherer illuminates the complicated relationship between diversity and court legitimacy. She shows us how diverse representation can positively impact perceptions of the court among women and racial minorities, while having a negative impact on the perceptions among white people and men. Ultimately, Diversifying the Courts provides insight into the impact of gender, race, and ethnicity on the courts, illuminating some of the major challenges facing the American judicial system in the years that lie ahead.
— Eric Waltenburg, author of Choosing Where to Fight: Organized Labor and the Modern Regulatory State, 1948-1987
"This book shows us why efforts to diversify the federal bench over the past four decades have done little to increase the legitimacy of the courts. Scherer compellingly explores this diversity dilemma, offering important insights about the future of our courts."
— Michael Zilis, author of The Rights Paradox: How Group Attitudes Shape US Supreme Court Legitimacy
"[Scherer] shares takeaways from conversations with sitting district court justices and the empirical results of surveys on support for the courts and specific judges’ decisions given varying conditions of diversity."
"Scherer addresses why U.S. presidents choose—or don’t choose—to diversify the federal courts by race, ethnicity, and gender and tracks the controversial history and politics of court diversification. Drawing on polls, political experiments, surveys, and interviews, she examines the complicated relationship between diversity and court legitimacy."
"In this intellectually engaging and empirically rich book that would be perfect for undergraduate and graduate courses, Scherer analyzes qualitative and quantitative data to better understand judicial appointments and the complicated relationship between judicial diversity and court legitimacy."