Skip to product information
1 of 1

Eucharistic Sacrifice and Patristic Tradition in the Theology of Martin Bucer, 1534-1546

Publisher:

Regular price $168.00
Regular price $0.00 Sale price $168.00
Sold out
Luther described the Mass as the “greatest and most horrible abomination” of the papal church. On this, he argued, nothing could be surrendered. However, during the 1530s and early 1540s, the Stras...
Read More
  • 23 November 2004
View Product Details
Luther described the Mass as the “greatest and most horrible abomination” of the papal church. On this, he argued, nothing could be surrendered. However, during the 1530s and early 1540s, the Strasbourg reformer Martin Bucer (1491-1551) sought rapprochement with the Catholics on precisely this matter.
This book looks at Bucer’s overtures to Catholic moderates in the era of the religious colloquies. He proposed to circumvent the Reformation impasse by returning to the Eucharistic theology of the church fathers and early scholastics. These efforts culminated in the Eucharistic articles of the Worms-Regensburg Book (1541). Bucer’s falling out with the same Catholics in aftermath of the Colloquy of Regensburg reveals the extent to which the agreed articles were based on misunderstanding – as well as the considerable common ground that continued to exist between them.
In its examination of this most fraught of Reformation debates, the book also sheds light on Bucer’s ecumenical theology and his aspirations for a reunion of the German and European churches.
files/i.png Icon
Price: $168.00
Pages: 320
Publisher: Brill
Imprint: Brill
Series: Studies in the History of Christian Traditions
Publication Date: 23 November 2004
ISBN: 9789004141384
Format: Hardcover
REVIEWS Icon
'While the principal focus in [...] Thompson's book, is on the developing Catholici-Protestant divide that would soon make permanent the split within what had been the unity of Western Christendom, Bucer was also involved, as noted, in the attempt to forge a unity (albeit fragile) within Protestantism as well. As a mediating figure in a time of increasingly intense passions, Bucer was deeply suspect, if not indeed reviled, for what he sought to achieve - and he continues to be treated with some disdain in some circles - but he deserves and deserves better...welcome addition to a still relatively small literature in English on this enigmatic reformer.'
N. Scott Amos, Renaissance Quarterly, 2005.
'Thompson's study is a considered contribution to the debate and makes available a wealth of continental sources to an English-speaking readership.'
Andreas Loewe, Ecclesiastical History, 2006.
'The contributors to this enlightening and highly readable volume are to be commended warmly for their work in catalyzing the discussion.'
Simon Doubleday, American Historical Review, 2005.
Nicholas Thompson, Ph.D. (2000) in Ecclesiastical History, University of Glasgow, is Lecturer in Church History at the University of Aberdeen.