Skip to product information
1 of 1

Getting Over Equality

Publisher:

Regular price $107.00
Regular price $107.00 Sale price $107.00
Sold out
Questions of religious freedom continue to excite passionate public debate. Proposals involving school prayer and the posting of the Ten Commandments in schools and courtrooms perennially spur cont...
Read More
  • 01 September 2001
View Product Details

Questions of religious freedom continue to excite passionate public debate. Proposals involving school prayer and the posting of the Ten Commandments in schools and courtrooms perennially spur controversy. But there is also a sense that the prevailing discourse is exhausted, that no one seems to know how to think about religious freedom in a way that moves beyond our stale, counterproductive thinking on this issue.
In Getting over Equality, Steven D. Smith, one of the most important voices now writing about religious liberty, provocatively contends that we must get over our presumption mistakenly believed to be rooted in the Constitution that all religions are equally true and virtuous and "authentically American." Smith puts forth an alternative view, that the courts should promote an ideal of tolerance rather than equality and neutrality. Examining such controversial examples as the animal sacrifice case, the peyote case, and the problem of aid to parochial schools, Smith delineates a way for us to tolerate and respect contrary creeds without sacrificing or diluting our own beliefs and without pretending to believe in a spurious "equality" among the variety of diverse faiths.

files/i.png Icon
Price: $107.00
Pages: 225
Publisher: NYU Press
Imprint: NYU Press
Series: Critical America
Publication Date: 01 September 2001
Trim Size: 9.00 X 6.00 in
ISBN: 9780814797945
Format: Hardcover
BISACs: LAW / General, RELIGION / General
REVIEWS Icon
"Moving beyond stale arguments about the ‘separation of church and state' and exposing the incoherence of doctrines of ‘equality,' Smith proposes a vibrant practice of tolerance and prudence that holds high promise for our continuing debate over the role of religion in the public square. His argument is lucid, forceful, sometimes eccentric, and refreshingly free of legalistic cant."