Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
For Simon-Claude Constant-Dufeux (1801–1871), a radical French architect and chair of perspective at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris, the study and composition of ornament were essential pursuits. Architectural emblems and ornaments were symbols that conveyed concise and immediate meaning; they were also a crucial element in realizing the Romantic ideal of the synthesis of the arts.
Through the lens of Constant-Dufeux’s work, Ornament and Symbol in French Romantic Architecture explores the sudden proliferation of ornamental motifs in France, challenging the understanding that the twentieth-century modernist avant-garde developed in direct opposition to ornament. Ralph Ghoche examines architectural ornament from the July Monarchy to the Second Empire, revealing its connections to Romantic theories of symbolism and ideas about the power of form to elicit emotional responses. Ghoche repositions Constant-Dufeux as a pivotal figure in developing new forms of symbolic signification in architecture, establishing him as one of Romanticism’s key theoreticians.
Ornament and Symbol in French Romantic Architecture reconstructs vibrant debates surrounding theories of the symbol, the public function of architecture, and the quest for the synthesis of the arts, revealing architectural ornamentation to be part of a process of modernization that continued into the next generation of architects and artists, ultimately culminating in the advent of art nouveau.
“In this vital contribution to the renaissance of interest in the history of ornament, Ralph Ghoche resurrects the career of Simon-Claude Constant-Dufeux, an eccentric but essential figure at the heart of French architectural Romanticism. Ghoche follows theories of ornament and symbols from debates over architectural meaning in the 1830s through to the vestibule of art nouveau half a century later, a trajectory that reveals deeper connections between studies of botanic ornament and the origins of abstraction in modernist thought than previously acknowledged.” Barry Bergdoll, Columbia University