Skip to product information
1 of 1

Sherlock in the Seventies

Regular price $17.00
Regular price $0.00 Sale price $17.00
Sold out
Every era has had the Sherlock Holmes it wanted or needed—except the 1970s. In that wild decade, all bets were off . . .The popular image of Sherlock Holmes at any given time derives as much from t...
Read More
  • 01 July 2021
View Product Details

Every era has had the Sherlock Holmes it wanted or needed—except the 1970s. In that wild decade, all bets were off . . .

The popular image of Sherlock Holmes at any given time derives as much from the actors who've portrayed the detective as it does from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s original stories and Sidney Paget’s famous illustrations. In earlier and subsequent decades this image was defined by a single stage or screen actor (from William Gillette and Basil Rathbone to Jeremy Brett and Robert Downey Jr.), but the nine Sherlock Holmes films made in the ’70s re-imagine the detective in starkly divergent ways, from the boldly inventive to the flat-out irreverent. Holmes is variously portrayed as gay (Robert Stephens), crazy (George C. Scott), pompous (Stewart Granger), petulant (Gene Wilder), vulnerable (Nicol Williamson), camp (Roger Moore), wrong-headed (John Cleese), silly (Peter Cook), and socially conscious (Christopher Plummer). Yet all these films contribute in their own way to casting new light on the legend.

In Sherlock in the Seventies, Derham Groves offers an entertaining and absorbing account of these films, packed with shrewd analysis and insights, background details, numerous illustrations, and behind-the-scenes anecdotes.

files/i.png Icon
Price: $17.00
Pages: 266
Publisher: Verse Chorus Press
Imprint: The Visible Spectrum
Publication Date: 01 July 2021
Trim Size: 8.00 X 5.25 in
ISBN: 9781953835093
Format: Paperback
REVIEWS Icon

"I can’t believe that any other fictional creation has been at once so adaptable, so impervious to change and so capable of accommodating the audiences of such different eras as this remarkable eccentric." - Vincent Canby, New York Times